簡(jiǎn)介：上海大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文軟件著作權(quán)行政保護(hù)姓名趙靖申請(qǐng)學(xué)位級(jí)別碩士專業(yè)憲法與行政法學(xué)指導(dǎo)教師陶鑫良20040501ABSTRACTACCORDINGTOTRIPS，INTE【LEC七乩A1PROPERTYRIGHTIPR’ISAPRIVATERIGHTGENERALLY，COUNTRIESINTHEWORLDADOPTJUDICIALPROTECTIONMODELNAMEDAS“SOLOTRACKSYSTEM”TOIPRINCLUDINGSOFTWARECOPYRIGHTTHEREFORE，ITISBELIEVEDTHATANYCONDUCTOFTORTONSOFTWARECOPYRIGHTISNOTNECESSARYTOBEINTERVENEDBYADMINISTRATIVEAUTHORITYNOMATTERINLAWMAKINGORLAWENFORCINGINFACT，ITISAVERYIMPORTANTINSTRUMENTOFTHESTATE’SNECESSARYINTERFERENCETOCIVILACTIVITIESTHATANYTORT，WHICHDAMAGESSOCIALPUBHCINTERESTSSHOULDTAKERESPONSIBILITYOFADMINISTRAFIVEOBLIGATIONBV也ESTATESOFTWARECOPYRIGHTADMINISTRATIVEAUTHORITYANDSUCHADMINISTRATIVEPROTECTIONREALLYDOESNONSUBSTITUTEANDPOSITIVEACTIONINTHEPROCESSOFPROTECTINGSOFTWARECOPYRIGHTANDPROMOTINGINDUSTRIESDEVELOPMENTALTHOUGHCOPYFIGHTISORIGINALLYAPRIVATERIGHT，THEREISADIALECTICALANDUNITEDRELATIONSHIPBETWEENPUBLICANDPERSONALINTERESTSINTHEULTIMATELAYERINTHEFINALEFFECT，PROTECTIONSBYPUBLIC】AWANDPRIRATELAWPOINTTOTHESAMEAIMTHEPURPOSETOESTABLISHALEGALSYSTEMOFCOPY『IGHTADMINISTRATIVEPROTECTIONISTOMAINTAINSOCIALECONOMICORDERANDPROTECTSOCIALPUBLICINTERESTEVENHAVINGACKNOWLEDGEDCOPYRIGHTISAPRIVATERIGHT，TRIPSDOESNOTEXCLUDEFROMADMINISTRATIVEMETHODONIPPROTECTIONONTHECONTRARY‘NUPSREGULATESTHESAMEASJUDICIALPROTECTIONPRINCIPLE。LHISPAPERINTENDSTOANALYZETHEECONOMICSTATUSANDACTIONOFSOFTWAREINDUSTRYTHEMAINFACTORSWHICHEFFECTSOFTWAREINDUSTRYDEVELOPMENT，THEDAMAGEANDTHEMAINCAUSESOFTORTINSOFTWAREFIELD，LEGALNATUREOFCOPYRIGHT，THEDEFINITIONOFPUBLICINTERESTS，THEDIFFERENCEBETWEENADMINISTRATIVEANDJUDICIALFUNCTIONSONSOFTWARECOPYRIGHT，SOLLEDIFFICULTISSUESONSOFTWARECOPYRIGHTADMINISTRATIVEPROTECTIONANDRESOLUTIONSINRECENTYEARS，THEDEVELOPMENTTRENDONSOFTWARECOPYRIGHTADMINISTRATIVEPROTECTIONANDOURCOUNTRYSAPPROPRIATEACTION，TODEMONSTRATETHENECESSITYOFSOFTWARECOPYRJGHTADMINISTRATIVEPROTECTIONTOOURSOFTWAREINDUSTRYDEVELOPMENTANDLEGALFEASIBILITY，SOAS‘OPROVIDERELERENCEONPROTECTIONOFSOFTWARECOPYRI曲TLEGALBENEFITSANDPROMOTIONOFOURSOFTWAREINDUSTRYDEVELOPMENTKEYWORDSCOPYRIGHTSOFTWAREADMINISTRATIVEPROTECTION

簡(jiǎn)介：上海大學(xué)法學(xué)碩十學(xué)位論文論著作權(quán)領(lǐng)域的間接侵權(quán)摘要在我國(guó)的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)法體系中，最早研究“間接侵權(quán)”行為是在專利法領(lǐng)域中，在著作權(quán)法領(lǐng)域中并沒有直接規(guī)定“間接侵權(quán)”制度，相關(guān)的研究只是散見于專家的著述、現(xiàn)實(shí)的案例中，國(guó)內(nèi)有一些文章提及“間接侵權(quán)”這一名詞，但深入研究者很少。隨著網(wǎng)絡(luò)時(shí)代的來臨越來越多的學(xué)者開始關(guān)注網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供者的間接侵權(quán)責(zé)任，國(guó)內(nèi)法院在總結(jié)審理網(wǎng)絡(luò)案件的基礎(chǔ)上出臺(tái)了相關(guān)的司法解釋。但實(shí)踐中，對(duì)于計(jì)算機(jī)軟件最終用戶責(zé)任、網(wǎng)絡(luò)鏈接侵權(quán)責(zé)任等責(zé)任中都涉及到著作權(quán)間接侵權(quán)責(zé)任。西方國(guó)家在著作權(quán)法中己明確將間接侵權(quán)作為一種侵權(quán)形式加以規(guī)定，并且在審判相關(guān)案件中總結(jié)出許多經(jīng)驗(yàn)值得我國(guó)借鑒。我們認(rèn)為，我國(guó)作為發(fā)展中國(guó)家有著與發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家不同的發(fā)展背景，究竟要提供多高的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)水平是一個(gè)要通盤考慮的問題。既不能和世界水平相距太大，又不能對(duì)于發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家的專橫霸權(quán)完全聽之任之。著作權(quán)間接侵權(quán)制度涉及的不穩(wěn)定因素很多，有些還比較敏感，屬于國(guó)家利益問題。建立此項(xiàng)制度必須遵循把握好著作權(quán)人利益和社會(huì)公眾利益平衡的原則，做到既大力保護(hù)廣大著作權(quán)人的合法利益，激發(fā)其創(chuàng)作的積極性，又要本著促進(jìn)科技發(fā)展的精神，合理確定間接侵權(quán)人的法律責(zé)任，這樣刁能真正體現(xiàn)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)制度的重要意義。全文共四章，第一章首先回顧了著作權(quán)法的發(fā)展歷史和新技術(shù)的發(fā)展對(duì)著作權(quán)法的影響，主要為后面具體闡述著作權(quán)間接侵權(quán)提供背景基礎(chǔ)第二章是全文的重點(diǎn)，主要著眼于間接侵權(quán)行為在著作權(quán)領(lǐng)域的特點(diǎn)，運(yùn)用比較的研究方法借鑒國(guó)外現(xiàn)己成型的規(guī)定，同時(shí)結(jié)合我國(guó)國(guó)情重點(diǎn)分析間接侵權(quán)的概念特征、表現(xiàn)形式、構(gòu)成要件、法律責(zé)任，目的是從宏觀上把握著作權(quán)間接侵權(quán)制度第三章主要研究著作權(quán)領(lǐng)域幾種典型的間接侵權(quán)行為，結(jié)合國(guó)內(nèi)外的案例來分析評(píng)價(jià)我國(guó)相關(guān)法律規(guī)定的利弊，并提出修改的建議。第四章是文章的結(jié)尾，最后預(yù)測(cè)這一制度在我國(guó)建立的前景并且提出建立這一制度的方案。此外，本文在寫作過程中提出了一些理論見解，表現(xiàn)在分析了間接侵權(quán)和共同侵權(quán)的關(guān)系以及對(duì)我國(guó)如何在現(xiàn)階段建立間接侵權(quán)制度提出了設(shè)想，以期對(duì)我國(guó)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)制度的發(fā)展貢獻(xiàn)微薄之力。關(guān)鍵詞著作權(quán)，間接侵權(quán)，代位侵權(quán)，幫助侵權(quán)原創(chuàng)性聲明本人聲明所呈交的論文是本人在導(dǎo)師指導(dǎo)下進(jìn)行的研究工作。除了文中特別加以標(biāo)注和致謝的地方外，論文中不包含其他人已發(fā)表或撰寫過的研究成果。參與同一工作的其他同志對(duì)本研究所做的任何貢獻(xiàn)均已在論文中作了明確的說明并表示了謝意。簽名碎業(yè)日期本論文使用授權(quán)說明本人完全了解上海大學(xué)有關(guān)保留、使用學(xué)位論文的規(guī)定，即學(xué)校有權(quán)保留論文及送交論文復(fù)印件，允許論文被查閱和借閱學(xué)?？梢怨颊撐牡娜炕虿糠謨?nèi)容。保密的論文在解密后應(yīng)遵守此規(guī)定一141簿HMY、

簡(jiǎn)介：十月革命一聲炮響，世界上誕生了第一個(gè)社會(huì)主義國(guó)家一蘇聯(lián)，開辟了人類歷史新紀(jì)元，蘇聯(lián)布爾什維克黨自然而然從革命黨變成為執(zhí)政黨。在執(zhí)政時(shí)期，由于權(quán)力過分集中，又缺乏有效的監(jiān)督，一些領(lǐng)導(dǎo)干部產(chǎn)生了脫離群眾、高高在上的官僚主義作風(fēng)，甚至在黨內(nèi)滋生腐敗現(xiàn)象。革命導(dǎo)師列寧審時(shí)度勢(shì)，適時(shí)提出了權(quán)力監(jiān)督理論，為鞏固年輕的蘇維埃政權(quán)，遏制權(quán)力腐敗起到重要作用，豐富和發(fā)展了馬克思恩格斯的監(jiān)督理論。本文堅(jiān)持歷史與邏輯相一致的原則運(yùn)用文獻(xiàn)研究法，揭示了列寧監(jiān)督理論形成的歷史條件和理論來源，初步梳理了列寧關(guān)于權(quán)力監(jiān)督理論，主要涵蓋五個(gè)方面權(quán)力監(jiān)督的原則、權(quán)力監(jiān)督的方式、權(quán)力監(jiān)督的機(jī)制，權(quán)力監(jiān)督的本質(zhì)與特點(diǎn)。列寧在法律監(jiān)督方面的有關(guān)思想，是列寧在領(lǐng)導(dǎo)俄國(guó)革命的過程中為解決當(dāng)時(shí)迫切的革命實(shí)踐問題和理論問題而提出來的，受到所處特定時(shí)代及那個(gè)時(shí)代的政治經(jīng)濟(jì)條件的影響，具有明顯的時(shí)代烙印和民族特征。當(dāng)然，列寧提出的各種觀點(diǎn)、原則是極其深刻的，曾經(jīng)影響我國(guó)法制的建設(shè)。我國(guó)檢察制度的選擇與建構(gòu)中，既借鑒了列寧的有關(guān)思想及其指導(dǎo)下的蘇聯(lián)檢察制度，又根據(jù)中國(guó)國(guó)情進(jìn)行了本土化，在制度和思想上調(diào)整和發(fā)展。本文在對(duì)中國(guó)檢察監(jiān)督制度以及在實(shí)踐中所遇的具體困境逐一進(jìn)行分析后，以列寧的權(quán)力監(jiān)督理論為引領(lǐng)，結(jié)合我國(guó)檢察監(jiān)督的實(shí)踐，分析了我國(guó)檢察監(jiān)督實(shí)踐的現(xiàn)狀，特別是我國(guó)檢察監(jiān)督遇到的困境，進(jìn)而提出了解決困境的具體對(duì)策，如完善檢察機(jī)關(guān)檢察監(jiān)督權(quán)的立法、拓展案源渠道、探索新的檢察監(jiān)督形式等，揭示了列寧權(quán)力監(jiān)督理論的當(dāng)代價(jià)值。

簡(jiǎn)介：河北師范大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文著作權(quán)合理使用制度理論分析姓名盧蓬申請(qǐng)學(xué)位級(jí)別碩士專業(yè)馬克思主義理論與思想政治教育指導(dǎo)教師郭凱峰20040520河北師范大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文著作權(quán)合理使用制度理論分析從而使知識(shí)財(cái)富利用效益達(dá)到最大化。本文在第一章簡(jiǎn)述了著作權(quán)合理使用的產(chǎn)生歷史。在第二章綜合分析了有關(guān)合理使用定義的各種學(xué)說，探討了其行為特征和法律屬性。在對(duì)合理使用的性質(zhì)及內(nèi)涵有了初步了解的基礎(chǔ)之上，本文在第三章從更深一層次對(duì)合理使用制度作了探索，即從法理學(xué)和民法學(xué)及經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)的角度，分析論證了合理制度存在的原因。然后結(jié)合各國(guó)立法及判例，從規(guī)則主義的角度，在第四章探討合理使用的構(gòu)成條件，并在對(duì)我國(guó)著作權(quán)法中合理使用的具體情形進(jìn)行了分析。最后在第五章對(duì)現(xiàn)代科技條件下我國(guó)著作權(quán)合理使用制度的建構(gòu)提出了一些自己的看法。關(guān)鍵詞著作權(quán)合理使用利益價(jià)值構(gòu)成2

簡(jiǎn)介：湘潭大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文我國(guó)計(jì)算機(jī)軟件著作權(quán)保護(hù)問題研究姓名鐘照元申請(qǐng)學(xué)位級(jí)別碩士專業(yè)法律指導(dǎo)教師馮曉青20040501ABSTRACTTHISARTIDEORIGINATESFROMTHEDISCUSSIONABOUTTHECOMPUTERSOFTWAREPROTECTIONLEVELBETWEENSCHOLARSAFTERTHEPUBLICATIONOFNEWCOMPUTERSOFTWAREPROTECTIONSTATUTE，WHICHWENTINTOEFFECTIU2001THEESSENCEOFTHISDEBATEISAGAMEBETWEENRIGHTHOLDER’SINTERESTSANDTHEPUBLICINTERESTSTHROUGHTHESURVEYONTHENEWSTATUE，THEAUTHORWANTSTOESTABLISHTHETHEORETICALFOUNDATIONOFCOMPUTERSOFTWAREPROTECTIONSYSTEMINOURCOUNTRYANDANALYZESSOMEIMPORTANTQUESTIONSINTHENEWSTATUTETHEAUTHORCOMMENCESWITHTHEANALYSISOFTHECONCEPTOFPROPERTY，ANDDISCUSSESTHEESSENCEANDCHARACTEROFPROPERTY，THENEXPOUNDSTHEESSENCEANDATTRIBUTEOFTHECOMPUTERSOFTWARECOPYRIGHT，IEITISAKINDOFMONOPOLYRIGHTTOPRODUCEANDMANAGE，WHICHISOFSCARCITY。乃翎THEMAINTHEORETICALFOUNDATIONOFTHEBUILDINGOFTHEPROTECTIONSYSTEMOFCOMPUTERSOFTWAREISEXPATIATEDASTOTHELAWMAKINGPROTECTIONMODEOFCOMPUTERSOFTWARE，THEAUTHORALSOTHINKSTHEPROTECTIONMODEBYCOPYRIGHTLAWISOFADVANTAGEBUTNOTPERFECTASTOTHEREASONABILITYOFTHERIGHTHOLDER’SINTERESTTHEAUTHOREXPOUNDSTHEFOLLOWINGTWOASPECTSOFTHELABORTHEORYOFPROPERTYANDTHETHEORYOFENCOURAGEMENTASTOTHEREASONABILITYOFTHEPUBLICINTERESTS，THEAUTHORSETSFORTHFROMTHELABORTHEORYOFPROPERTYANDTHETHEORYOFPERSONALI哆ATTHESAMETIMETHESYSTEMATICGUARANTEEONTHEPUBLICINTERESTSISANALYZEDLASTLYTHEAUTHORDISCUSSESTHETWOEXTRUDEPROBLEMSINTHEPROTECTIONSYSTEMOFCOMPUTERSOFTWARE，IE，THEPROBLEMOFSOFTWAREPIRATEANDTHEPROTECTIONLEVELOFCOMPUTERSOFTWAREASTOTHESOFTPIRATE，THEFUNDAMENTALMETHODISTODECREASETHELEGALSOFTWARE’SPRICEATPRESENTASTOTHEPROTECTIONLEVELOFTHECOMPUTERSOFTWAREINCHINA，THEREGULATIONOFTHETHIRDLEVEL’8PROTECTIONISNOTREASONABLE

簡(jiǎn)介：點(diǎn)擊查看更多有線數(shù)字電視視頻點(diǎn)播中的著作權(quán)人及其相關(guān)權(quán)利探討.pdf精彩內(nèi)容。

簡(jiǎn)介：湘潭大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文計(jì)算機(jī)軟件著作權(quán)侵權(quán)問題研究姓名宋振凌申請(qǐng)學(xué)位級(jí)別碩士專業(yè)法律指導(dǎo)教師馮曉青20040401ABSTRACTINOURCOUNTRY,BECAUSEOFTHESERIOUSPHENOMENONOFINFRINGINGUPONTHECOPYRIGHTOFTHECOMPUTERSOFTWAREATPRESENT,ITHASIMPORTANTREALISTICMEANINGTORESEARCHONTHEQUESTIONOFINFRINGEMENTOFTHECOMPUTERSOFTWARECOPYRIGHT．THISDISSERTATION，WHICHISSUPPORTEDBYGENERALTORTTHEORY,DRAWSLESSONSFROMTHEACADEMICRESULTSINTHEFIELDOFCOPYRIGHTANDOTHERINTELLECTUALPROPERTYRIGHTSFIELD，TOPROBEINTOTHEQUESTIONOFTHEASSERTINGOFTORTOFCOMPUTERSOFTWARECOPYRIGHTANDOFTHECOMPENSATIONFORINFRINGEMENTOFCOMPUTERSOFTWARECOPYRIGHT，ETC．．THEDISCUSSIONONTHETYPESOFTORTSISTHEBEGINNINGOFTHISPAPER．WITHTHETYPEOFTHECOMPUTERSOFTWARECOPYRIGHTASTHECRITERIAFORCLASSIFICATION，THEAUTHORANALYZESTHETORTSOFCOMPUTERSOFTWARECOPYRIGHTINTERMSOFRIGHTCONTENT，ANDTHENDISCUSSESHOWTOASSERTTHETORTSOFCOPYRIGHTOFCOMPUTERSOFTWARE．DURINGTHEPROCESSOFPROBINGINTOTHEPRESENTLEGALSTANDARDANDTECHNOLOGICALMETHODOFASSERTINGINFRINGEMENTOFTHECOMPUTERSOFTWARECOPYRIGHT，THEAUTHORPUTSFORWARDHISOWNOPINIONONTHEQUESTIONSOFAPPLICATIONOFSSO、THESTANDARDOFPROOFOF‘ACCESS”O(jiān)F“SUBSTANTIALSIMILARITYANDACCESS”，ETC．ABOUTTHEQUESTIONOFTHERELIEFOFTHEDAMAGEDCOPYRIGHT，CONSIDERINGTHESPECIALCIRCUMSTANCESINTHEFIELDOFCOMPUTERSOFTWARECOPYRIGHT,THEAUTHORMAKESPRELIMINARYRESEARCHONTHEPRINCIPLEOFCOMPENSATIONFORDAMAGE、THERANGEANDCOMPUTINGMETHODOFCOMPENSATIONFORDAMAGE，DRAWINGLESSONSFROMTHEGENERALTHEORYOFCOMPENSATIONFORDAMAGE．ASEXEMPTIONSOFINFRINGEMENTOFCOMPUTERSOFTWARECOPYRIGHT，THEQUESTIONOFFAIRUSE、EXHAUSTIONOFRIGLLTANDREVERSEENGINEERINGAREDISCUSSEDESPECIALLY．

簡(jiǎn)介：山東大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文音樂作品的著作權(quán)關(guān)系研究姓名原蓉蓉申請(qǐng)學(xué)位級(jí)別碩士專業(yè)民商法學(xué)指導(dǎo)教師郭慶存20040325山東大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文ABSTRACTTHEMODEMCOPYRIGHTLAWSHOULDPMTECTTHEDISSEMINATORANDTHEUSER’SINTERESTBESIDESOFFERINGPROTECTIONTOTHECOPYRIGHTOWNDRSINORDERTOIMPROVETHEHUMANBEING’SPROGRESSINORDERTOBALANCETHECONTRADICTIONAMONGTHECOPYRIGHTOWNERS，THEUSERSANDTHECOMMUNALINTERESTOFTHESOCIETYITISNECESSARYFORCOPYRIGHTLAWTOMAKEAMEASUREANDHARMONYAMONGEVERYSUBJECTOFCOPYRIGHTTHESUBJECTOFMUSICWORKSCOPYRIGHTISMORECOMPLEXCOMPARED、VIN】OTHERWORKSTHISPAPERANALYZESTHERELATIONSHIPSAMONGTHESUBJECTSACCORDINGTOTHEPROCESSOFPRODUCING，PERFORMING，RECORDING，BROADCASTING，WEBCASTING，USINGTHEMUSICWORKSFROMTHEPOINTOFVIEWOFLAWREGULATIONSONTHEBASISOFANALYZINGTHEREGULATIONSOFOURCOUNTRY’SCOPYRIGHTLAWTHISPAPERALSOINTRODUCETHERELATIVEREGDAFIONSANDOFFOREIGNCOUNTRYESPECIALLYTHESUCCESSFULEXPERIENCEOFUS，ANDTHENBRINGFORWARDCONSTRUCTIVEADVISETOOURCOUNTRY’SLEGISLATIVERESEARCHANDJUDICATORYPRACTICETHISPAPERISCONSISTEDOFEIGHTPARTS，THEFIRSTPARTOFTHISPAPERINTRODUCESTHEDEFINITIONOFMUSICWORKS一THEWORKSUSEDTOSINGORPERFORMINCLUDINGTHEWORDSACCOMPANIED諏TLLTHERHYTHMSUCHASSONGSANDSYMPHONYITISDIFFERENTFROMPHONOGRAMSANDSOUNDRECORDINGSTHESUGGESTIONISTHATTHEFUTURELEGISLATIONSHOULDRECOGNIZETHECREATIVESOUNDSRECORDINGSTHESECONDPARTTILITHESEVENTHPARTOFTHISPAPERANALYZESTHEMAINRELATIONAMONGDIFFERENTSUBJECTACCORDINGTHEPROCESSOFMUSICWORK’SCREATIONTILLBEINGUSEDHOWTODEALWITLLTHEDIFFERENTPERMISSIONOFDIFFERENTSUBJECTSRELATEDTOTHEUSINGOFMUSICWORKSTHEGENERALIDEAISTAKINGTHEAUTHOR’SRI曲TASTHECOREOFCOPYRIGHTLAWANDTHERIGHTOFTHEAUTHORCALLBEPROPERLYRESTRICTEDBYMEAOSOFTHESYSTEMOFFAIRUSE，THESYSTEMOFSTATUTORYPERMISSIONANDTHESYSTEMOFCOMPULSORYPERMISSIONINORDERTOREACHABALANCEBETWEENEVERYPARTYATTHESAMETIME，THESUBJECTOFTHECOPYRIGHTSHOALDBEPERMITTEDTEALIZETHERELATIVERIGHTTHROUGHCONTRACTTHISPAPERALSOPUTFORWARDSOMENEWPROBLEMS，SUCHASTHEFIRSTSINGMGRIGHTPARODYBOOTLEG，ROYALTYPAYMENTSONRECORDINGDEVICE，PUBLICBROADCASTFIGHT，WEBCASTINGTHISPAPERALSOGIVESANSWERTOTHESEQUESTIONSTHEEIGHTHPARTINTRODUCESTHESYSTEMOFCOLLECTIVEADMINISTRATIONOFMUSICWORKSINORDERTOEFFECTIVELYREALIZETHECOPYRIGHTOWNERANDTHENEIGHBORINGRI曲TOWNER’SRIGHTTHELASTPARTISEPILOGUEOFTHISPAPERKEYWORDSCOPYRIGHTLEGALRELATIONSHIPBALANCE2壓孝劈LEGALSTATUTORYPERMISSIONPROFITTHETHEORYOFFAIRUSE工一LF馳G

簡(jiǎn)介：華中科技大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文論作品角色的著作權(quán)保護(hù)姓名徐啟俊申請(qǐng)學(xué)位級(jí)別碩士專業(yè)法律碩士指導(dǎo)教師易繼明20110521華中科技大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文華中科技大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文IIABSTRACTTHEACTEROFWKSALSONAMEDTHEARTISTICIMAGEOFWKSUSUALLYMEANPERSONANIMALROBOTOFWKSWHICHAPPEARINMOVIETELEVISIONANIMATIONETCTHEACTEROFWKSALSOINCLUDESTHEPURELYIMAGINATIVEPERSONOFTHEWKSDESCRIBEDINLANGUAGEITWILLVIOLATETHERIGHTINTERESTOFTHEOBLIGEETHATMAKINGUSEOFAWELLKNOWNACTEROFWKSTOPROMOTETHESALEOFMERCHISESERVICETAKINGADVANTAGEOFTHEPOPULARITYINFLUENCEOFTHEACTEROFWKSTOCREATEWKSISWITHOUTTHEPERMISSIONFROMTHEOBLIGEEOFTHEACTEROFWKSWHICHWILLCAUSETHELAWSUITOFINFRINGEMENTCONSEQUENTLYITTURNSINTOAACADEMICREALISTICPROBLEMTHATHOWPEOPLEPROTECTTHEOBLIGEE’RIGHTOFTHEACTEROFWKSUSETHEACTEROFWKSREASONABLYINTHETHEYFIELDJURIDICALPRACTICEOFCHINAFEIGNCOUNTRYTHEREISDIFFERENCEBETWEENUSINGTHEMERCHISINGRIGHTTHERIGHTOFPUBLICITYTOPROTECTTHEACTEROFWKSINSPITEOFADOPTINGWHICHKINDOFPROTECTIONMODESTHEREEXISTTHATTHEPROTECTIONSCOPEISLIMITEDNEWLAWISNEEDEDTOBEMADEINCHINAONTHEBASISOFTHEEXISTINGLAWWEADVOCATETOPROTECTINGTHEACTEROFWKSBYMAKINGUSEOFTHECOPYRIGHTOTHERLAWSADDITIONALLYFMTHECOMPREHENSIVEMODEOFTHEPROTECTIONOFTHEACTEROFWKSTHEARTICLECONSISTSOFFIVEPARTSINTHEFIRSTPARTTHEPROBLEMISPUTFWARDTHENTHEPRESENTCONDITIONOFCHINESEFEIGNRESEARCHISREVIEWEDTHERESEARCHMETHODSUBJECTOFTHEARTICLEISPUTFWARDTHESECONDPARTINTRODUCESTHEACTEROFTHEWKSEXPLAINSTHETYPEOFUSEOBLIGEETHECOMPOSINGFACTTHECLASSIFICATIONOFTHEACTEROFWKSTHETHIRDPARTDISCUSSESTHEJUSTIFIABILITYOFUSINGCOPYRIGHTTOPROTECTTHETHEACTEROFWKSTHEFOURTHPARTDISCUSSESTHECONDITIONOFUSINGCOPYRIGHTTOPROTECTTHETHEACTEROFWKSTHEFIFTHPARTDISCUSSESUSINGCOPYRIGHTTOPROTECTTHEDIFFERENTTYPECOMPOSINGFACTOFTHEACTEROFWKSINAWDBECAUSETHEACTEROFWKSDERIVESFROMWKSITHASCREATIVITYCANBEPROTECTEDBYCOPYRIGHTWHILEWECAN’TMAKEUSEOFTHECOPYRIGHT

簡(jiǎn)介：獨(dú)創(chuàng)性聲明本人聲明所呈交的學(xué)位論文是本人在導(dǎo)師指導(dǎo)下進(jìn)行的研究工作和取得的研究成果，除了文中特別加以標(biāo)注和致謝之處外，論文中不包含其他人已經(jīng)發(fā)表或撰寫過的研究成果，也不包含獲得西南政法大學(xué)西南政法大學(xué)或其他教育機(jī)構(gòu)的學(xué)位或證書而使用過的材料。與我一同工作的同志對(duì)本研究所做的任何貢獻(xiàn)均已在論文中作了明確的說明并表示了謝意。學(xué)位論文作者簽名馮文瑞簽字日期2009年4月8日學(xué)位論文版權(quán)使用授權(quán)書本學(xué)位論文作者完全了解西南政法大學(xué)西南政法大學(xué)有關(guān)保留、使用學(xué)位論文的規(guī)定。特授權(quán)西南政法大學(xué)西南政法大學(xué)可以將學(xué)位論文的全部或部分內(nèi)容編入有關(guān)數(shù)據(jù)庫(kù)進(jìn)行檢索，并采用影印、縮印或掃描等復(fù)制手段保存、匯編以供查閱和借閱。同意學(xué)校向國(guó)家有關(guān)部門或機(jī)構(gòu)送交論文的復(fù)印件和磁盤。（保密的學(xué)位論文在解密后適用本授權(quán)說明）學(xué)位論文作者簽名馮文瑞導(dǎo)師簽名李雨峰簽字日期2009年4月8日簽字日期2009年4月8日碩士學(xué)位論文著作財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)質(zhì)權(quán)制度研究著作財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)質(zhì)權(quán)制度研究STUDYONTHESYSTEMOFPLEDGEONPROPERTYRIGHTSINAWORK作者姓名馮文瑞指導(dǎo)教師李雨峰教授西南政法大學(xué)SOUTHWESTUNIVERSITYOFPOLITICALSCIENCEANDLAW

簡(jiǎn)介：山東大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文委托作品著作權(quán)歸屬研究姓名閻春光申請(qǐng)學(xué)位級(jí)別碩士專業(yè)法律指導(dǎo)教師李霞20040920山東大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文ABSTRACTASASPECIALIZEDTYPEOFWORKS,COMMISSIONEDWORKISBASEDONTHECOMMITMENTBETWEENTHECONSIGNERSANDTHEASSIGNEESTHEPROVISIONSOFOURCOUNTRYSCOPYRIGHTLAWONTHEATTRIBUTIONOFTHECOMMISSIONEDWORKSCOPYRIGHTARETOOSIMPLEITLACKSTHEPRECISEANDREASONABLEDISTRIBUTIONOFRIGHTSANDRESPONSIBILITYBETWEENTHECONSIGNERANDTHEASSIGNEE,WHICHLEADSTOAGREATAMOUNTOFCONTROVERSIESINTHEJUDICIALPRACTICETHISESSAYSSTANDPOINTISCONTRACTLAWANDCOPYRIGHTLAWBYUSINGTHEMEANSOFCOMPARISONANDLEGALEXPLANATION,ITDISCUSSESTHECONTROVERSYOVERTHECOPYRIGHTOFTHECOMMISSIONEDWORKSFURTHERMORE,ITBRINGSFORWARDTHEMODIFICATIONSUGGESTIONSONOURCOMMISSIONEDWORKSLEGISLATIONITENUMERATESTHETYPESOFCONTROVERSIESANDRELEVANTCASESINTHEJUDICIALPRACTICEINTHEFIRSTCHAPTERTHEAUTHORATRIBUTESTHEMAJORCAUSESOFTHECONTROVERSIESTOSOCIALDIVISION,THEWEAKNESSOFCONSCIOUSNESSONCOPYRIGHTANDTHEOVERSIMPLELEGISLATIONTHESIMPLENESSANDABSOLUTIZATIONOFTHELEGISLATIONRESULTSINDIFERENTUNDERSTANDINGSOFTHEJUDICIALDEPARTMENTANDADMINISTRATIVEDEPARTMENTFORLAWENFORCEMENTONTHISPROBLEMITEMPHASIZESONTHEQUALITYOFTHELEGALRELATIONSHIPOFTHECOMMISSIONEDCREATIONBYMEANSOFTHETHEORYOFCONTRACTLAWINTHESECONDCHAPTERITCONCLUDESTHATTHEQUALITYOFSUCHWORKSFALLSINTOTHECATEGORYOFTHECIVILCONTRACTSTHENITPOINTSOUTTHEREISALOGICALANDLEGALMISTAKEINTHEEXPRESSIONABOUTTHECOMMISSIONEDWORKSOF“WITHOUTSIGNINGACONTRACT“AFTERTHECOMPARISONOFCONTRACTOFCOMMISSIONEDCREATIVEWORKWITHCONTRACTOFBAILMENTCONTRACTOFWORKANDCONTRACTOFSERVICE,THEAUTHORCONCLUDESTHATCONTRACTOFCOMMISSIONEDCREATIONISDIFERENTFROMTHEOTHERTYPESOFCONTRACTSASARESULT,WESHOULDSTUDYITASANINDEPENDENTTYPEOFCONTRACTITTAKESTHEMEANSOFCOMPARISONANDLEGALEXPLANATIONINTHETHIRDCHAPTERFIRSTLY,ITDISCUSSESTHEGENERALPRINCIPLESOFTHEASCRIPTIONOFTHECOMMISSIONEDWORKSCOPYRIGHTSECONDLY,ITANALYSESTHEPOSSIBILITYOFTHEWHOLLYTRANSFEROFTHECOMMISSIONEDWORKSCOPYRIGHTBASINGONTHEANALYSISOFTHELEGISLATIVECASESOFDIFERENTSYSTEMSOFLAW,WITHEMPHASISONTHE“MONISM“AND“DUALISM“OFTHECOPYRIGHTSSTRUCTUREINTHECIVILLAWSYSTEM,

簡(jiǎn)介：英文摘要ABSTRACTABSTRACTTILISARTICLESETABOUTANALYZINGTHEBASICCONCEPTOFPOLITICALCIVILIZATIONREVIEWTHEBASICCONTENTSOFTHEDEVELOPMENTOFTHEMARXISTPOLITICALCIVILIZATIONANDTHETHOROUIGHDISCUSSINGOFTHESOCIALISTPOLITICALCIVILIZATIONHACKLELENIN’SLATERTHOUGHTOFTHEPOLITICALCIVILIZATIONISONEIMPORTANTPARTOFLENIN’SSYSTEMTHISIDEAHASVERYDEEPSETTHEORYFOUNDATIONANDREFLECTSAGEREQUESTANDTHESITUATIONOFTHECOUNTRYANDDEVELOPSMARXISMLENIN’SLATERTHOUGHTOFTHEPOLITICALCIVILIZATIONC∞NSLLUCTCDTHEBASICFRAMEOFTHESOCIALPOLITICALCIVILIZATIONTHEORYTHESOCIALPOLITICALCIVILIZATIONISACOMPLEXSYSTEMATICPROJECT；LENIN’SLATERTHOUGHTOFTHEPOLITICALCIVILIZATIONHASVERYIMPORTANTPRACTICALANDACADEMICSIGNIFICANCETOTHESOCIALPOLITICALCIVILIZATIONKEYWORDSPOLITICALCIVILIZATION；LEGALSYSTEM；SUPERVISE；THEREFORMOFPOLRICALSYSTEM；THECONSTRUCTOFTHEREIGNINGPARTYⅡ

簡(jiǎn)介：摘要摘要著作人格權(quán)是研究著作權(quán)不可或缺且最富有理論性、最能表現(xiàn)出著作權(quán)與其他財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)相異點(diǎn)的問題當(dāng)今世界，隨著國(guó)際經(jīng)濟(jì)關(guān)系的發(fā)展，著作權(quán)制度的許多規(guī)定都由國(guó)際公約達(dá)成了很大的趨同。然而，在著作人格權(quán)的保護(hù)方面，以英、美為代表的普通法系和以法、德為代表的大陸法系由于著作權(quán)制度的基本理念不同，采取了迥然不同的方式來保護(hù)著作人格權(quán)，使得著作人格權(quán)的保護(hù)在國(guó)際上存在諸多不和諧。與此同時(shí)，隨著高新技術(shù)的發(fā)展，傳統(tǒng)的著作人格權(quán)制度受到了巨大的沖擊和挑戰(zhàn)，在數(shù)字和網(wǎng)絡(luò)技術(shù)迅猛發(fā)展的今天，能否恰當(dāng)處理著作人格權(quán)問題將關(guān)系到信息產(chǎn)業(yè)整體發(fā)展的成敗。由此使我們?cè)诜此紓鹘y(tǒng)的著作人格權(quán)不可轉(zhuǎn)讓、不可剝奪性質(zhì)是否仍具合理性的同時(shí)，不得不對(duì)數(shù)字網(wǎng)絡(luò)時(shí)代的著作人格權(quán)制度予以重新思考。文章首先對(duì)傳統(tǒng)環(huán)境下兩大法系和國(guó)際公約著作人格權(quán)保護(hù)的立法現(xiàn)狀和發(fā)展趨勢(shì)進(jìn)行比較分析，以期尋求合理的途徑來協(xié)調(diào)大陸法系作者權(quán)與英美法系版權(quán)之間的差異，從而建立在兩個(gè)法系均切實(shí)可行的制度，促進(jìn)著作人格權(quán)保護(hù)水平的一致。其次，文章分析了著作人格權(quán)在國(guó)際互聯(lián)網(wǎng)環(huán)境下仍然具有十分重要的存在價(jià)值，但也面臨著嚴(yán)峻的挑戰(zhàn)。同時(shí)，闡述了利益平衡原理是構(gòu)建著作人格權(quán)制度的理論基石。這意味著著作人格權(quán)立法的目的必須是保護(hù)作者權(quán)益與促進(jìn)文化事業(yè)的發(fā)展兩者并重，著作人格權(quán)制度的設(shè)定必須是“保護(hù)”與“限制”兩者不能偏廢。著作人格權(quán)利益平衡思想所追求的，實(shí)質(zhì)上是各種利益沖突因素處于相互協(xié)調(diào)之中的和諧狀態(tài)，簡(jiǎn)而言之，也就是作者利益與公眾利益的平衡法律應(yīng)努力在兩種不同的利益之間尋找最佳平衡點(diǎn)。文章最后對(duì)構(gòu)建數(shù)字網(wǎng)絡(luò)時(shí)代的著作人格權(quán)制度，大膽地進(jìn)行了設(shè)想1應(yīng)建立著作人格權(quán)的轉(zhuǎn)讓制度擴(kuò)大作者的權(quán)利范圍，使作者能根據(jù)自身的意愿，基于合同處理著作人格權(quán)，從而更全面地享有著作權(quán)的權(quán)益。2、應(yīng)明確規(guī)定著作人格權(quán)的合理使用制度。通過綜合考慮被使用作品的性質(zhì)、使用作品的方式、使用作品的目的、使用作品的后果等方面因素，采用彈性標(biāo)準(zhǔn)來判定著作人格權(quán)合理使用的范圍，使社會(huì)公眾能更充分地分享現(xiàn)代技術(shù)條件下信息廣泛傳播的利益。ABSTRACTITISANINDISPENSABLEANDMOSTTHEORETICALPROBLEMTOSTUDYMORALRIGHTSOFCOPYRIGHT,ANDTHEREISOBVIOUSDIFERENCEBETWEENCOPYRIGHTANDOTHERPROPERTYRIGHTSNOWADAYSWITHTHEDEVELOPMENTSOFINTERNATIONALECONOMICRELATIONSHIP,MANYINTERNATIONALCONVENTIONSREACHAGREEMENTSONMANYREGULATIONSOFMORALRIGHTSOFCOPYRIGHTHOWEVER,ITISVERYDISHARMONIOUSTOPROTECTMORALRIGHTSOFCOP州GHTAMONGMANYCOUNTRIES,BECAUSETHEBASICIDEASANDTHEWAYOFPROTECTIONOFCOPYRIGHTINCOMMONLAWSYSTEMCOUNTRIESWHICHISTYPICALOFENGLANDANDAMERICAISVERYDIFERENTFROMCIVILLAWSYSTEMCOUNTRIES,WHICHISEXAMPLESOFGERMANYANDFRANCEMEANWHILEWITHTHEDEVELOPMENTOFHIGHTECHNIQUE,TRADITIONALMORALRIGHTSOFCOPYRIGHTIMPACTANDCHALLENGESTRONGLY,SOTHEDEVELOPMENTOFWHOLEINFORMATIONINDUSTRYDEPENDSONTHERIGHTLEGISLATIONOFSOLVINGPROBLEMSOFMORALRIGHTSOFCOPYRIGHTTHEREFORE,REFLECTINGTRADITIONALNATUREOFNONTRANSFER,UNABLEDEPRIVATIONANDPERMANENTPROTECTIONOFMORALRIGHTSOFCOPYRIGHT,WEMUSTRECONSTRUCTINSTITUTIONOFMORALRIGHTSOFCOPYRIGHTINNETWORKERAFISTOFALL,THISPAPERINDUCESANDSUMMARIZESLEGISLATIONSITUATIONANDTHEDEVELOPINGTENDENCYOFTHETWOLAWSYSTEMSSOASTOEXPLOREARATIONALWAYTOHARMONIZETHEDIFERENCEBETWEENAUTHORSRIGHTOFCIVILLAWSYSTEMANDITOFCOMMONLAWSYSTEMTHUS,WECANESTABLISHASERIESOFPRACTICABLEINSTITUTIONSINTHETWOLAWSYSTEMSINORDERTOPROMOTEIDENTITYOFPROTECTIONLEVELOFMORALRIGHTSOFCOPYRIGHTSECONDLY,THISPAPERANALYSESTHEIMPORTANTOFMORALRIGHTSOFCOPYRIGHTUNDERTHECIRCUMSTANCEOFINTERNATIONALINTERNETANDATTHESAMETIMEITALSOFACESTHESEVERELYCHALLENGETHENEWTECHNIQUEREVOLUTIONISTHECAUSEOFREFORMOFMORALRIGHTSOFCOPYRIGHTANDITISNECSSARYFORTHEDEVELOPMENTOFDIGITALNETWORKTECHNIQUETOESTABLISHASCIENTIFICSYSTEMONMORALRIGHTSOFCOPYRIGHTSLAWINADDITION,THEPRINCIPLEOFBENEFITBALANCEISTHEBASETOESTABLISHINSTITUTIONSOFMORALRIGHTSOFCOPYRIGHTITMEANSTHATTHEPURPOSELEGISLATIONISNOTONLYTOPROTECTAUTHORS

簡(jiǎn)介：原創(chuàng)性聲明本人鄭重聲明本人所呈交的學(xué)位論文，是在導(dǎo)師的指導(dǎo)下獨(dú)立進(jìn)行研究所取得的成果。學(xué)位論文中凡引用他人已經(jīng)發(fā)表或未發(fā)表的成果、數(shù)據(jù)、觀點(diǎn)等，均已明確注明出處。除文中已經(jīng)注明引用的內(nèi)容外，不包含任何其他個(gè)人或集體已經(jīng)發(fā)表或撰寫過的科研成果。對(duì)本文的研究成果做出重要貢獻(xiàn)的個(gè)人和集體，均已在文中以明確方式標(biāo)明。本聲明的法律責(zé)任由本人承擔(dān)。論文作者簽名日期三一彳“關(guān)于學(xué)位論文使用授權(quán)的聲明本人在導(dǎo)師指導(dǎo)下所完成的論文及相關(guān)的職務(wù)作品，知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)歸屬蘭州大學(xué)。本人完全了解蘭州大學(xué)有關(guān)保存、使用學(xué)位論文的規(guī)定，同意學(xué)校保存或向國(guó)家有關(guān)部門或機(jī)構(gòu)送交論文的紙質(zhì)版和電子版，允許論文被查閱和借閱；本人授權(quán)蘭州大學(xué)可以將本學(xué)位論文的全部或部分內(nèi)容編入有關(guān)數(shù)據(jù)庫(kù)進(jìn)行檢索，可以采用任何復(fù)制手段保存和匯編本學(xué)位論文。本人離校后發(fā)表、使用學(xué)位論文或與該論文直接相關(guān)的學(xué)術(shù)論文或成果時(shí)，第一署名單位仍然為蘭州大學(xué)。本學(xué)位論文研究?jī)?nèi)容／叼可以公開口不易公開，已在學(xué)位辦公室辦理保密申請(qǐng)，解密后適用本授權(quán)書。請(qǐng)?jiān)谝陨线x項(xiàng)內(nèi)選擇其中一項(xiàng)打“4“論文作者簽名李冬F(xiàn)，壘導(dǎo)師簽名論文作者簽名皇三匕導(dǎo)師簽名日期圣呈蘭蘭日期竺竺蘭三石THESTUDYOFCOPYRIGHTINFRINGEMENTANDCOMPENSATIONSTANDARDABSTRACTTHECOPYRIGHTOFTHE21STCENTURYNOTONLYWITHAWIDERANGEOFCREATORS，RIGHTHOLDERALSOHAVEAVERYWIDERANGEOFUSERSHEREREFERSTOTHETERMINALCONSU_MELSABOOKAMOVIENOTONLYTHECOPYRIGHTBRINGPEOPLEENJOYTHEPLEASUREOFSPIRITANDALSOFORTHEPUBLISHERSTUDIOSANDINTERMEDIARYINTERESTGROUPBRINGHUGEPROFITSBUTTHEPROBLEMSFACINGTHECOPRIGHTFIELDISTHECOPYRIGHTINFRINGEMENTCASENUMBEROFHIGHLEVEL，ANDPRESENTSTHEFASTGROWTHTHETENDENCY’ANDONLY2010YEARSFORTHELOCALCOURTOFTHEINTELLECTUALPROPERTYRIGHTSANDCONCLUDETHENEWCIVILTRIALOFCASESAND41718PIECESOF42931PIECES，AYEARONYEARGROWTHOF4018％AND3674％RESPECTIVELYAMONGTHEM，THECOPYRIGHTCASE24719PIECES，A6154％INCREASEFROMTHEPREVIOUSYEAR；THISWORTHYOFDISCUSSIONISOURCOUNTRYOFCOPYRIGHTINFRINGEMENTANDDETERMINETHECOMPENSATIONAMOUNTBASEDONTHESTANDARDALLTHESESTUDIESHELPTOSOLVETHECASESOFINFRINGEMENTOFSCIENCETHISARTICLETHROUGHTHEFOLLOWINGFOURPARTSINTHECOPYRIGHTINFRINGEMENTANDCOMPENSATIONSTANDARDQUESTIONSTHEFIRSTPARTISCHINASCOPYRIGHTRIGHTSTOCONTENTANDTHECOPYRIGHTINFRINGEMENTPROBLEMSAREINTRODUCEDANDDISCUSSEDFIMTINTRODUCEDTHEATPRESENTINOURCOUNTRYUNDERTHEPROTECTIONOFTHECOPYRIGHTRIGHTCONTENTHELPTOABUSEOFJUDGEMENTSECONDLXTHEPAPERINTRODUCESANDCOPYRIGHTINFRINGEMENTCASESINCHINAWASSUMMARIZEDTHESITUATIONFORTHECAUSEOFTHEINFRINGEMENTOFCOPYRIGHTISDISCUSSEDNEXTANALYZEDANDDISCUSSEDTHERIGHTINFISNGEMENTRESPONSIBILITYIMPUTATIONPRESUMPTIONOFFAULTLIABILITYPRINCIPLEANDINOURCOUNTRYUNDERTHECOPYRIGHTINFRINGEMENTLIABILITYCONSTITUENTSFINALLYITISPOINTEDOUTTHATCHINASCURRENTCOPYRIGHTLAWINTHECOPYRIGHTINFRINGEMENTCOMPENSATIONPROVISIONSINTHEINSUFFICIENTTHESECONDPARTISOFTHREEKINDSOFCOPYRIGHTINFRINGEMENTCOMPENSATIONPRINCIPLEINTRODUCTIONANDDISCUSSIONFIRSTLYINTRODUCESTHECOPYRIGHTINFRINGEMENTCOMPENSATIONTHEHI曲ESTPRINCIPLESOFCOMPREHENSIVECOMPENSATIONPRINCIPLE，THEOVERALLCOMPENSATIONPRINCIPLEANALYSISANDTOPUNISHSOCIALISTTHEORYANDCOMPENSATIONSOCIALISTTHEORYISDISCUSSEDNEXTISTOLEGALCOMPENSATIONPRINCIPLEOFANALYSISANDDISCUSSIONPOINTSOUTTHEADVANTAGESANDDISADVANTAGESOFLEGALCOMPENSATIONTOFINDAREASONABLELEGALPROVISIONSFORCOMPENSATIONFINALLYITISTHEMENTALDAMAGECOMPENSATIONRESTRICTIONSINTRODUCEDTHEPRINCIPLEANDTHETHEORYII

簡(jiǎn)介：學(xué)號(hào)201052311074分類號(hào)D9234碩士學(xué)位論文論網(wǎng)絡(luò)著作權(quán)侵權(quán)的責(zé)任認(rèn)定研究生姓名姚程上指導(dǎo)教師房紹坤教授學(xué)科門類法學(xué)專業(yè)名稱法律碩士論文提交日期2012年3月12日煙臺(tái)煙臺(tái)大學(xué)學(xué)位論文原創(chuàng)性聲明和使用授權(quán)說明大學(xué)學(xué)位論文原創(chuàng)性聲明和使用授權(quán)說明原創(chuàng)性聲明原創(chuàng)性聲明本人鄭重聲明所呈交的學(xué)位論文，是本人在導(dǎo)師的指導(dǎo)下，獨(dú)立進(jìn)行研究工作所取得的成果。除文中已經(jīng)注明引用的內(nèi)容外，本論文不含任何其他個(gè)人或集體已經(jīng)發(fā)表或撰寫過的作品或成果。對(duì)本文的研究做出重要貢獻(xiàn)的個(gè)人和集體，均已在文中以明確方式標(biāo)明。本聲明的法律結(jié)果由本人承擔(dān)。論文作者簽名日期年月日學(xué)位論文使用授權(quán)說明學(xué)位論文使用授權(quán)說明本人完全了解煙臺(tái)大學(xué)關(guān)于收集、保存、使用學(xué)位論文的規(guī)定，即按照學(xué)校要求提交學(xué)位論文的印刷本和電子版本；學(xué)校有權(quán)保存學(xué)位論文的印刷本和電子版，并提供目錄檢索與閱覽服務(wù)；學(xué)?？梢圆捎糜坝　⒖s印、數(shù)字化或其它復(fù)制手段保存論文；在非保密的論文范圍內(nèi)，學(xué)校可以公布論文的部分或全部?jī)?nèi)容。（保密論文在解密后遵守此規(guī)定）論文作者簽名導(dǎo)師簽名日期年月日