我國(guó)公益信托監(jiān)察人制度的完善.pdf

1、1內(nèi)容摘要信托法律制度發(fā)源于英國(guó)，從興起之后就一直為推進(jìn)公益事業(yè)而服務(wù)。但是英國(guó)的信托法中并沒有關(guān)于公益信托監(jiān)察人制度的規(guī)定，日本在引進(jìn)信托法時(shí)創(chuàng)制了該制度。我國(guó)《信托法》中借鑒了大陸法系國(guó)家的做法，在立法條文中明確規(guī)定我國(guó)公益信托中必須設(shè)置信托監(jiān)察人。但因我國(guó)信托的發(fā)展起步較晚，相關(guān)法律規(guī)定并不完善，其中公益信托監(jiān)察人制度的規(guī)定簡(jiǎn)單，難以有效發(fā)揮信托監(jiān)察人監(jiān)督受托人的職能而且受益人的利益無法得到切實(shí)保護(hù)，對(duì)我國(guó)公益信托的發(fā)展產(chǎn)生了消極

2、影響。鑒于此，本文試圖在公益信托監(jiān)察人制度的完善方面進(jìn)行研究。全文共分四個(gè)部分展開討論。第一部分從理論層面對(duì)公益信托監(jiān)察人制度進(jìn)行了解釋說明。簡(jiǎn)要說明了公益信托監(jiān)察人的基本內(nèi)容，從兩方面分析了設(shè)立公益信托監(jiān)察人制度的必要性，分析了公益信托監(jiān)察人重要的法律地位，說明發(fā)展我國(guó)公益信托的關(guān)鍵在于完善信托監(jiān)察人制度。第二部分根據(jù)我國(guó)《信托法》中關(guān)于公益信托監(jiān)察人制度的規(guī)定，指出了該制度存在的立法缺陷。詳細(xì)介紹了五個(gè)方面的立法缺陷，分別是任職條件

3、未規(guī)定、職權(quán)規(guī)定模糊、缺少義務(wù)與責(zé)任的規(guī)定、未解決監(jiān)察權(quán)的沖突以及缺少對(duì)信托監(jiān)察人的監(jiān)管。第三部分考察了其他國(guó)家和地區(qū)的公益信托監(jiān)察人制度。筆者介紹了英美法系的英國(guó)、美國(guó)《信托法》的規(guī)定，以及大陸法系的日本、韓國(guó)和我國(guó)臺(tái)灣地區(qū)《信托法》的規(guī)定。通過對(duì)比分析，指出了我國(guó)可以借鑒的域外先進(jìn)成果。第四部分筆者重點(diǎn)提出了完善公益信托監(jiān)察人制度的建議。根據(jù)第二部分指出的該制度存在的立法缺陷，結(jié)合第三部分對(duì)域外相關(guān)法律的借鑒，從公益信托監(jiān)察人的任職

4、條件、權(quán)利、義務(wù)和責(zé)任、監(jiān)察權(quán)沖突的解決以及監(jiān)管這幾個(gè)方面提出了建議，希望能對(duì)完善我國(guó)公益信托監(jiān)察人制度有所幫助。關(guān)鍵詞：信托；信托法；公益信托；公益信托監(jiān)察1AbstractiginatinginBritainTrusthasbeenkeptservingthepublicwelfareutilityfromtheverybeginning.HoweverregulationofitabletrustsupervisinBritain

5、isnearlyblank.TrustsupervisisfirstestablishedinJapanTrustLaw.BasedontheTrustLawofthecontinentallawsystemcountriestheTrustLawofthepeoplesrepublicofChinamakesaclearregulationthattheremustbetrustsupervisinthepublicwelfaretr

6、ustsystem.HowevertheprovisionoftrustinChinaisimperfect.Actonthesupervisofpublicwelfaretrustistoosimplethatthetrusteecan’teffectivelyperfmtheirdutieseffectivelyprotecttheinterestsofbeneficiarieswhichblockstheconductofthep

7、ublicwelfaretrustinChina.Inthisdissertationauthfocusesthestudyonsystemimprovementofitabletrustsupervisasfoursections.Firstitelabatestheitabletrustsupervissystem.Basedontheanalysisofthesystemofitabletrustsupervissthisdiss

8、ertationdemonstratestheLegalstatusofaitabletrustsupervisintwoaspects.Itdiscussesthenecessityoftheestablishmentofthesystemofitabletrustsupervissfromboththeeticalpracticalaspectsalsorevealsthatitabletrustlegalsystemshouldb

9、eimprovedfromtherespectofitabletrustsuperviss.ThesecondpartpointsoutthatthedefectsofthesupervissystemoftheitabletrustintheTrustLawofPRC.Fivedefectsofthelegislativedeficienciesareintroducedindetailincludingnojobrequiremen

10、tunclearregulationofpositionpowertheshtageofobligationsresponsibilitiesnosolutiontotheconflictsbetweendifferentsupervisionlackingofsupervisiontopublictrustsupervismonitingrights.Thethirdpartexplestheitabletrustsupervissy

11、stemsinothercountriesregions.IntroducestheprovisionsofBritishAmericanlawincommonlawsystemsaswellastheprovisionsinthecontinentallawsystemsofJapanSouthKeaTaiwanregionofourcountry.Bycomparingthedifferentprovisionsoftheitabl