20102015年美國(guó)國(guó)情咨文的批評(píng)話語(yǔ)分析

1、 分 類(lèi) 號(hào)： H315 單位代碼： 單位代碼：10190 研究生學(xué)號(hào)： 研究生學(xué)號(hào)： 201411010 密 級(jí)： 無(wú) 碩 士 學(xué) 位 論 文 A Critical Discourse Analysis of the State of the Union Addresses (2010-2015) 2010 2010-2015 2015 年美國(guó)國(guó)情咨文的批評(píng)話語(yǔ)分析

2、 年美國(guó)國(guó)情咨文的批評(píng)話語(yǔ)分析 研 究 生 姓 名 研 究 生 姓 名 : 馮 哲 專(zhuān) 業(yè): 外國(guó)語(yǔ)言學(xué)及應(yīng)用語(yǔ)言學(xué) 外國(guó)語(yǔ)言學(xué)及應(yīng)用語(yǔ)言學(xué) 指導(dǎo)教師及職稱(chēng)： 指導(dǎo)教師及職稱(chēng)： 金 萬(wàn) 鋒 (副 教 授) 培 養(yǎng) 單 位： 長(zhǎng)春工業(yè)大學(xué) 長(zhǎng)春工業(yè)大學(xué)

3、 2017 2017 年 6 月研 究 生 學(xué) 位 論 文 Abstract Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) is a new interdisciplinary achievement of linguistics, which originated from the late 1970s in Britain. Critical discourse analy

4、sis is to expose the influence of ideology on discourse and the counteraction of discourse to ideology through the surface level of language. Critical discourse analysis mainly analyzes the relationship between discourse

5、, power and ideology. In critical discourse analysis, language is viewed as a social practice, which is closely related with social development. That is to say, critical discourse analysis not only emphasizes the languag

6、e features, but also pays more attention to the social background in order to have more profound understanding of ideology and power hidden in the language. The theory and analysis tool of CDA is based on Halliday’s Syst

7、emic-Functional Grammar and Fairclough’s Three-Dimensional Framework. To Halliday’s mind, language is not only a tool for communication, but also a social practice. The form of language that people choose in communicatio

8、n is determined by the social function. The Systemic-Functional Grammar not only describes the structure of the text, but also tries to explain how it produces. Fairclough interprets the discourse from the perspective of

9、 social practice. Discourse, as a part of social practice, is inevitably influenced by social, historical and cultural backgrounds and closely related to social structure. He argues that discourse can be divided into thr

10、ee dimensions, which include text, discourse practice and social practice. According to the three dimensions, Fairclough proposes a three-dimensional analysis model, that is, description, interpretation and explanation.

11、The author of the thesis systematically analyzes the State of the Union Addresses (SOUAs) from 2010 to 2015 by means of Systemic-Functional Grammar with Fairclough’s Three-Dimensional Framework. The analysis of the thesi

12、s is divided into three parts: describing the discourse, interpreting the discourse and explaining the social context. In the part of the description, the author mainly analyzes the language features of the discourse by

13、combining the three meta-functions theory. In the part of the interpretation, the production of the language features in the first part will be interpreted, including the content of the SOUAs, the relationships between t

14、he participants in the SOUAs and the role of language in the SOUAs. In the last part, the author analyzes the formation of the SOUAs from the perspectives of the social context and social determinants of the SOUAs. Thro

15、ugh the analysis of the State of the Union Addresses, the author finds that Barack Obama utilizes various language skills to build the discourse, transmit the basic policies to the audience, and win the support of people